In coastal ecosystems, scientists and managers often encourage the use of marine protected areas (MPAs) and other area-based conservation measures (OECMs) to provide both ecological and social benefits. This group is assessing the social, ecological, and institutional conditions under which the use of MPAs and OECMs are associated with positive outcomes for both people and nature, as well as the co-benefits and tradeoffs that exist between multiple outcomes.
OUR APPROACH: Using data from seven coastal countries in Africa, Asia, and the Pacific, this team is identifying how MPAs and OECMs contribute to successful outcomes under different social, ecological, and institutional conditions, and will translate the results into a tool to help managers make related decisions in the future.
This team is part of a cohort funded by the generosity of the David and Lucile Packard Foundation to address the theme of Oceans, Climate and Equity.
Understanding the relative effectiveness and enabling conditions of different area-based management tools is essential for supporting efforts that achieve positive biodiversity outcomes as area-based conservation coverage increases to meet newly set international targets. This study shows the effectiveness of Other Effective area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs) on producing measurable outcomes for coral reef biodiversity and the human communities.
Other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) represent unique opportunities to help achieve the 2030 biodiversity conservation agenda. However, potential misuse by governments and economic sectors could compromise the outcome of these conservation efforts. Here, we propose three ways to ensure that the application of OECMs toward meeting biodiversity targets provide benefits for both people and nature.
Coastal communities are on the frontlines of three accelerating global change drivers, climate change, blue growth, and the expansion of area-based conservation, leading to a “triple exposure” scenario. Despite efforts to maximize social benefits from climate, development, and conservation, externally driven processes can converge to amplify vulnerabilities and inequalities. This article offers recommendations to implementors to address these factors.
Wildlife Conservation Society
ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University
FAO
University of Michigan
World Wildlife Fund and Alliance for Conservation Evidence
University of Waterloo
WCS / University of Queensland
University of Victoria
Brock University
RARE Indonesia
French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) and Laboratoire d'Excellence CORAIL
RARE and Alliance for Conservation Evidence
Macquarie University
University of Waterloo and Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
World Wildlife Fund
NCEAS and University of California, Santa Barbara
Duke University
Food and Agriculture Organization
IUCN, WCPA Task Force on OECMs
Wildlife Conservation Society
Wildlife Conservation Society Indonesia
Talanoa Consulting Fiji
Wildlife Conservation Society
University of California, Santa Barbara
The Nature Conservancy
Wildlife Conservation Society
Stanford University
Wildlife Conservation Society
Wildlife Conservation Society Indonesia
MacArthur Foundation
Worldfish
Margaret A. Cargill Philanthropies
Blue-Green Advisors
The Pacific Community
Blue Action Fund
IUCN, World Commission on Protected Areas
Oregon State University
Bloomberg Philanthropies