• Use findings and results of data analysis to create lessons and recommendations to inform counter-wildlife trafficking practitioners. 
• Increase the number of collaborations between practitioners (Government and NGO) and criminologists that are applying crime science and criminology methods on the development and monitoring of counter wildlife trafficking strategies and interventions. 
• Disseminate findings and lessons learned through the creation of an interactive website for practitioners and the development of a special topics course at John Jay College through the International Crime and Justice Master of Arts Program.

• Develop a community of practice for CBNRM governance and economics in southern and eastern Africa to achieve measurable improvements in the conceptualization, monitoring, and performance of CBNRM at a household level.
• Develop monitoring tools to assess and track CBNRM impact at a household level (i.e. livelihoods; governance and social capital; wildlife tolerance) and community level (commercial and managerial performance). Compare the performance of participatory and representational forms of CBNRM by institutionalizing reporting dashboards in at least five countries.
• Use anchor sites in at least five countries to pilot participatory community-based governance,
• Facilitate scaling of strong practice through the development of training materials, guidelines and standards, and use these to strengthen CBNRM performance through national CBNRM associations and voluntary standards.

• Synthesize a multidimensional dataset from nearly 4,000 farms in Colombia, coupled with spatial modeling to explore real-world drivers of on-farm adoption, evaluate social-ecological impacts, and predict the benefits of silvopasture implementation at landscape scales
• Based on the science and in collaboration with end-users, co-develop guidance to inform sustainable cattle ranching and climate policies, environmental certification standards, and a farm planning tool to help scale up silvopasture adoption in Colombia and beyond

• Synthesis of current wild meat research. The working group will produce several policy briefs, synthesizing available data and research on wild meat in each of the focal countries (Gabon, Cameroon, DRC). These briefs will be provided in a timely manner to support policy discussions, and the content guided through conversations with government policy makers and stakeholders, ensuring that we are answering relevant questions posed by those directly involved with and affected by policy and legislative reforms.
• Support to national policy reform processes. We will support national policy makers to convene national workshops to discuss reforms to national wild meat policies. For each of the different countries, where policy discussions are at different stages, the aims of these workshops will vary, and may signal the beginning of policy discussions or be used to discuss draft policy documents and engage national stakeholders for their review.

1. New analysis of the potential social impacts of 30×30 at global level, under various scenarios for implementation. This will include analysis of affected populations disaggregated as far as possible by wealth, ethnicity, voice in decision making and other important social variables.
2. A more detailed analysis of one case study country (likely to be in Central Africa).
3. Feasible proposals for how 30×30 could be implemented at the country level in a way that maximises social benefits while minimising social harms, co-developed with implementation partners.
4. Improved dialogue and a strong foundation for future inter-disciplinary and cross-sectoral research collaboration between people with different perspectives on area-based conservation.

1a. Prioritize surveillance to focus on high-risk interfaces by synthesizing data on health impacts on wildlife, existing wildlife health surveillance systems, missing cases of wildlife health events and detection bias, and socio-ecological interfaces and high spillover risk practices;

1b. Address sustainability through analyses of data and creation of tools to estimate cost effectiveness and benefits of surveillance, drawing from existing wildlife or livestock surveillance systems;

2a. Communicate a co-developed theory of change that connects multilateral agreements (e.g., SDGs) and international frameworks to the practical implementation of wildlife surveillance systems;

2b. Formalize the consortium through the drafting of a collaboration agreement with endorsements from respective member institutions describing how we work together in the long term and identify capabilities, synergies, and gaps among stakeholders in the implementation of sustainable wildlife health surveillance globally.

• Provide consensus view of the key features of new marine interventions and examples of application of these features in climate-vulnerable systems.
• Co-design a marine intervention governance protocol and self-assessment tool to help decisionmakers identify governance capacity and needs, and to provide guidance on approaches to ensure responsible and effective intervention.
• Work with leaders of marine organizations to tailor results and products for global, national, and regional application in temperate and tropical oceans.

• Develop a toolkit that the finance sector and relevant companies can use to develop and deploy their biodiversity safeguards on-the-ground, and which can help them meet global standards to address biodiversity risks and the impacts of their investments

• Engage with policymakers, companies and practitioners from financial institutions to ensure the toolkit is practical and adaptable for targeted BRI stakeholders in the government, business and the finance sectors