Marine fisheries provide income, jobs, and nutrition for millions of people, but impacts of climate change are altering the productivity and distribution of fish stocks and the flows of benefits from fisheries. In this context of increasing change and uncertainty, effective fishery management systems need to be designed to support resilience. This working group will synthesize interdisciplinary information to identify key features of resilience and develop guidance on approaches, processes, and tools that can help operationalize resilience in fisheries around the world.
OUR APPROACH: Using experiences and data from around the world, this team will identify features of fisheries that support resilience in the context of climate change. We will analyze case studies to evaluate the benefits of these attributes in fisheries that have already experienced climate impacts. Ultimately, the working group will develop a tool to help managers assess and enhance resilience in a wide variety of fisheries.
This team is part of a cohort funded by the generosity of the David and Lucile Packard Foundation to address the theme of Oceans, Climate and Equity.
This paper from the Climate Resilient Fisheries working group offers an actionable framework that can be applied to assess and improve climate resilience, supporting fisheries practitioners as they look to adapt their management strategies to a changing climate.
Millions of people rely on fisheries for income, jobs, and food. How can fishers and fishing communities plan and prepare for an uncertain future? A new tool developed by SNAPP’s Climate Resilient Fisheries working group provides a way.
Identifying and understanding opportunities to improve and support climate resilience will become increasingly important for achieving the global Sustainable Development Goals. A decadal program we are contributing to, “Fisheries Strategies for Changing Oceans and Resilient Ecosystems by 2030,” or FishSCORE, was endorsed by the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development. The underlying evidence and framework for FishSCORE2030 are described in this article.
This analysis “examine[d] fishery systems across (a) ecological, (b) socio-economic and (c) governance dimensions using five resilience domains: assets, flexibility, organization, learning and agency, …[finding] few studies that test resilience attributes in fisheries across all parts of the system, with most examples focusing on the ecological dimension.”
Environmental Defense Fund
Gulf of Maine Research Institute
Cornell University
Nippon Foundation Ocean Nexus Program and Worldfish
Environmental Defense Fund
Environmental Defense Fund
ICES
University of California, Santa Barbara
Sustainability Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast
University of California, Santa Barbara
NCEAS and University of California, Santa Barbara
Harvard University
NOAA, Alaska Fisheries Science Center
Iwate University
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University; WorldFish
Environmental Defense Fund
University of Tasmania
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
Gulf of Maine Research Institute
NCEAS and University of California, Santa Barbara
The Nature Conservancy; University of California, Santa Barbara
FAO
University of Waterloo
FAO
The Nature Conservancy
University of British Colombia
James Cook University
University of California, Santa Barbara
Environmental Defense Fund
CSIRO
University of California, Santa Barbara
NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service
Talanoa Consulting Fiji
Wildlife Conservation Society
WorldFish-CGIAR, Penang
Stockholm Resilience Centre/ Stockholm University
University of Hamburg
Gulf of Maine Research Institute
Environmental Law Institute
Union of Concerned Scientists
University of Kiel
University of Cape Town
Cornell University
University of British Colombia
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
Ministry of Production, Peru