In recent years there has been an encouraging shift within the conservation community away from top-down, government-run, exclusionary protected areas, towards a recognition of and support for the effective stewardship of nature by Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs). A key part of this positive trend is increasing investment by civil society groups in support of IPLC efforts to steward their lands and waters through effective governance and management of the access and use of natural resources.
However, there remains gaps in our knowledge and understanding of a) what factors are requisites for effective community-level governance and how we might measure changes in these factors over time, and b) how IPLCs and their supporters may take practical actions to strengthen community-level governance systems to deliver effective stewardship in an uncertain future. This SNAPP working group aims to fill these knowledge gaps and help communities strengthen their governance systems and enable more effective and sustainable management of natural resources under their jurisdiction.
OUR APPROACH: This working group will synthesize decades of case studies about Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities’ efforts to attain the authority, capacity and power they need to govern access to and use of natural resources within their lands and waters effectively.
This working group is supported through the generosity of the Margaret A. Cargill Philanthropies to advance Indigenous Peoples and Local Community-leadership in conserving the planet’s natural patrimony.
Drawing on lessons learned from decades of on-the-ground experience and informed by evolving theories of collective action and common pool resource management, the group identified enabling factors for effective community-led natural resource governance and compiled guidance materials and created tools to help communities and their support partners establish those enabling conditions that are lacking.
This consensus statement defines effective and equitable community-level natural resource governance and identifies factors that help or hinder this approach in practices.
WWF Netherlands
North Carolina State University
Wildlife Conservation Society
Fauna & Flora International
International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Commission on Environment, Economic and Social Policy (CEESP)
Kunabi Indigenous Peoples India
Independent
Wildlife Conservation Society
The Nature Conservancy
International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED)
World Wildlife Fund
Wildlife Conservation Society - Cambodia
Forest Peoples Program
Well Grounded
Wildlife Conservation Society
Fauna & Flora International
Wildlife Conservation Society - Bolivia
The Nature Conservancy
The Nature Conservancy – Mongolia
Wildlife Conservation Society
American University
The Nature Conservancy
Integrated Rural Development and Nature Conservation (IRDNC) Namibia
Well Grounded
Wildlife Conservation Society
TetraTech/World Resource Institute (WRI)
Woodland Park Zoo