WORKING GROUPS

Photo Credit: Linda Muth/TNC Photo Contest 2021

Global Collaboration, Tangible Solutions: Teams Driving Science Into Action

A SNAPP team is a multi-disciplinary group of experts representing a broad suite of sectors, institutions, and specialties who would not otherwise convene around a targeted, complex challenge. 

working groups
30 +
experts
1100 +
institutions
600 +
countries
55 +

Since 2013, SNAPP has brought together over 1,290 experts from 720+ institutions across 70+ countries through 60+ cross-sector teams.

These multidisciplinary groups—spanning science, government, business, and civil society—tackle complex global challenges with collaborative, actionable research. Their work has produced 310+ tools and products, including 150+ peer-reviewed papers and at least a dozen spin-off initiatives.

Our Working Groups include:

  • Academic experts in scientific fields directly relevant to the key questions
  • Representatives of governments, multilateral institutions, and the private sector
  • Practitioners from conservation, humanitarian, sustainable development, cultural, and spiritual organizations

To date, these teams have produced 310+ outcomes and other science-to-solution “products,” including 150+ peer-reviewed papers, and at least 12 spin-off initiatives.

outcomes + products
277 +
peer reviewed papers
125 +
spin-off initiatives
5 +

Working Groups

Search By Status:
Jump To A Group:
Post Image Placeholder

Sustainable Cattle Ranching in Colombia

What are the real-world social-ecological outcomes of silvopasture transformation in Colombia? How can this evidence be utilized to inform farm planning tools and policy targets to benefit nature, climate, and human wellbeing?
Post Image Placeholder

Sustainable Wild Meat Management

How can Central African wild meat policies be adapted and strengthened to support sustainable use and ensure the persistence of Central Africa’s wildlife?
Post Image Placeholder

The Social Implications of 30×30

What are the implications for resident people of plans to greatly increase global protected and conserved area coverage, and how might these be addressed to maximize positive outcomes for nature and society?
Post Image Placeholder

Water Flow Impact

How can nature-based solutions alleviate the risks posed by both water shortages and excess water?
Post Image Placeholder

Water Sanitation and Nature

How can nature-based interventions be used to help billions of people access sanitation and higher quality water?
Post Image Placeholder

Water Security

Where can water funds – user investments to protect upstream watersheds and sources – benefit conservation, sustainable economic growth, and human well-being?
Post Image Placeholder

Wildfires and Human Health

What are consensus-driven, evidence-based approaches to identify and communicate the human health implications of wildfires versus ecological restoration-focused forest management, including managed fires?
Post Image Placeholder

Wildlife Corridor Restoration

What evidence is required for wildlife corridor restoration interventions in human-inhabited landscapes, and how do we include these in the restoration management process?
Post Image Placeholder

Wildlife Health Intelligence Network

Can we effectively strengthen wildlife health surveillance globally through a collaborative and evidence-based consortium of local, national, and international organizations?
Post Image Placeholder

Zero Deforestation Landscapes

Can innovative mapping tools help agricultural producers and companies meet commitments to zero-deforestation supply chains?

SNAPP has engaged more than 720 institutions and more than 1290 experts from over 70 countries through more than 60 teams of scientists and stakeholders since 2013.